Insight: reduce cost per tonne moved
Hyster Europe has done extensive analysis using data from telematics which offers insight into ways to reduce the cost per tonne moved.
The overall conclusion is that productivity has a greater impact on Total Cost of Operation (TCO) compared to minimising fuel consumption. While Hyster Container Handlers offer one of the lowest fuel consumption rates, this has been achieved without compromising productivity, says the firm.
“Better productivity has a greater impact on the cost per container moved,” states Chris van de Werdt, product strategy manager EMEA Big Trucks for Hyster Europe. “Fuel savings are good to have when they are not affecting productivity, as they are also a small percentage of the cost of running a machine.”
The company estimates that typically for the European and US market (excluding the tyre costs) just 16% of the total cost to run a ReachStacker, for example, is the fuel cost. 20% is maintenance costs, 20% is depreciation and a full 44% is operational costs, including the driver.
“Our approach to fuel savings has always been about the best balance to support busy operations,” says Chris. “Tests we have conducted indicated that the Hyster ReachStacker can be up to 12% more productive than a comparable product.”
“Real-life testing shows that 12% more containers can be moved per truck per hour in many operations, which quickly adds up. Excellent power response and productivity is often much better for operations with seasonal peaks and tight timescales when they need to push harder,” claims Chris.





